| The taste is exceptional; the 
				nutrition, superb. There is more control over food safety, less 
				waste in packaging, lower consumption of fossil fuels to 
				transport the food, and benefits to our state’s environment, 
				economy, and communities. The use of locally-grown foods can 
				also counter the trend of parts of America, even our Midwestern 
				rural areas, becoming like a colonies dependent on urban and 
				corporate food producers. It is scary to imagine a future era 
				when Iowa would have no farmers in the business of raising 
				quality food to sell directly to those who live here. 
 Another value of gardening and using locally-grown food is the 
				potential for engaging in a slower lifestyle and deriving the 
				intangible benefits–spiritual, emotional, neighboring, or 
				communal–that come from connecting with the earth and/or the 
				people who produce our food.
 
 That said, I should mention that gardening is not for everyone 
				and that non-gardeners too can be patrons of the local foods 
				movement.
 The book Bloom and Blossom, edited by Mary Swander, 
				Iowa State University professor and the state’s new poet 
				laureate, is a collection of essays about gardening. In the 
				first essay, “General Advice,” originally published in 1908, 
				L.H. 
				Bailey writes, “Every family can have a garden. If there is not 
				a foot of land, there are porches or windows. Wherever there is 
				sunlight, plants may be made to grow; and one plant in a tin can 
				may be a more helpful and inspiring garden to some minds than a 
				whole acre of lawn or flowers may be to another.”
 In the 1970s, I heard a man from the agricultural extension 
				department say that having fun and success were important 
				considerations for people who wanted to garden. He recommended 
				that people begin with a single tomato plant next to their door. 
				The idea was that they would pass by it often, appreciate its 
				daily development, and be able to pluck a tomato in the peak of 
				its ripeness without hiking to the back yard after a long day of 
				work to tend the vines or losing the out-of-sight-out-of-mind 
				fruit to neglect. His advice for people who wanted to put food 
				by in large quantity–say spaghetti sauce–was to buy the produce 
				in bulk from local farmers.
 I am reminded of the container garden on the deck of my 
				second floor Gilbert apartment. There I grew zinnias, herbs, 
				tomatoes, cucumbers, kale, and other vegetables before moving to 
				Ames nearly three years ago–a distance of some five miles. | 
			
				| 
					Regardless of what is written in this column, there are 
					people who will engage in gardening. Apparently, it’s our 
					nation’s number-one hobby. So the bigger question is how do 
					our towns and various organizations such as churches, 
					betterment groups, nursing homes, retirement centers, and 
					service clubs become more supportive of gardening and the 
					use of locally-grown food.
 I propose that a town or organization could do an informal 
					gardening inventory of its residents and/or members. The 
					project could start slowly on an experimental scale this 
					year. Then a year from now, the group could refine the plan 
					and expand the effort.
 
 What members or friends have turf with good topsoil, 
					drainage, and openness to sunshine where they would be 
					willing to host a garden plot? It could be 2x2 feet here or 
					3x9 feet there. It could be in an empty space between two 
					buildings on Main Street, on an island in a neighborhood 
					cul-de-sac, or in a front yard. Who has 
					gardening wisdom and a desire to be part of the project? Who 
					suffers from the impression that he or she has a brown thumb 
					but wants to garden? What resources such as the county 
					office of university agricultural extension service or a 
					local gardening group are available to lend advice?
 
 The idea would be to develop gardening circles analogous to 
					church circles, support groups, or interest groups such as 
					book clubs, investment clubs, and quilting bees. However, in 
					this case, each circle would focus on a specific 
					geographical location and the production of food. Ideally, 
					circle members would be able to walk, bicycle, or drive 
					their wheel chair with ease to their group’s garden plot. 
					The plots could be in various sections of town. And perhaps 
					there could be a small, highly visible plot next to city 
					hall or others in central places such as at the entrance of 
					a hospital or mall.
 
 Each group would discern its own goals and operating 
					guidelines. The operation may not be 100 percent bliss; but 
					in this not entirely perfect process may lie an avenue to 
					the deep bond that happens when people work together. A 
					circle would decide if it was going to have a “rugged 
					individualism” model with each person having a piece of the 
					turf to grow what he or she wants or if it would opt for 
					collaborative decision-making. There would be decisions 
					about what to grow, to grow organically or not, to use city 
					water or rain water, or to start from seed or transplants.
 
					The circle would decide upon its style of farming. Would 
					there be meticulous row crop gardening or messy permaculture 
					beds, advanced efforts put into layered beds that reduce the 
					need for weeding or Herculean efforts to pull weeds as the 
					season progresses? Oh yes, there would be decisions about 
					rabbits–whether to swear at them and threaten to get out the 
					pellet gun or simply greet and let them be (but certainly to 
					erect some fences around the vegetable patches). There will 
					be the rub of how to share the input costs and resolve 
					conflicts as well as dealing with varying work ethics, jobs 
					and vacation schedules, standards for cleaning the shovels, 
					rakes and other tools. Will there be one queen bee and 
					several worker bees? Will someone who can’t physically 
					engage in gardening be a welcome member of the circle and 
					benefit from being in a garden setting and connecting with 
					other gardeners? Maybe that person could read the 
					instructions from the back of the seed packets to the other 
					gardeners in the group or serve the lemonade and iced tea.
  				 
					How will the circle share its produce: among members, with 
					friends? As part of acongregational or community dinner? Set aside for a program such as the 
					Plant-a-Row-for-the-Hungry project, used in preparing meals 
					for a homeless shelter, brought to a sharing table at the 
					community center on a weekday or the church social hall on a 
					Sunday morning, delivered to the cook at a care center, or 
					sold to a make a dime or two? And the big question will be: 
					who is responsible for the bounty of unused zucchini!
 The new garden at the White House is more than a source of 
					fresh vegetables for Barack, Michelle, Malia, Sasha, 
					Michelle’s mother, and their guests. It is an iconic 
					project. The Victory Gardens of the 1940s provided more than 
					simply food for ordinary families. Those gardens, too, were 
					iconic–practical but a way to be grounded with limited 
					resources in the face of great challenges.
 
					The success of the proposed gardening circles could be not 
					merely a matter of the food and deepened friendships that 
					grow from the garden plots and the care of them. Its value 
					will also lie in the unexpected, intangible benefits–be they 
					spiritual, emotional, social, or political–that emerge from 
					such engagement and help fortify the members to face the 
					extraordinary challenges of this era. And just maybe, the 
					efforts of the members as part of a larger network will be 
					symbolic with a ripple effect that extends beyond the 
					specific congregation, organization, or community that 
					provides the oversight for the project.
 
 
					*Liberty Hyde Bailey 
					(1858-1954) is credited with being instrumental in starting 
					agricultural extension services, the 4-H movement, the 
					nature study movement, parcel post, and rural 
					electrification. He was considered the father of rural 
					sociology and rural journalism. (From Wikipedia) |